[1]游猛 吴杰英 陈岳 郑彬 詹河涓 狄金明.耻骨上前列腺切除与经尿道前列腺电切治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2015,(03):203-206.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2015.03.011 ]
 You Meng,Wu Jieying,Chen Yue,et al.Comparison of efficacy and safety of transvesical prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate for large hypelplasia of prostate[J].,2015,(03):203-206.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2015.03.011 ]
点击复制

耻骨上前列腺切除与经尿道前列腺电切治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较()
分享到:

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年03期
页码:
203-206
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-12-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of efficacy and safety of transvesical prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate for large hypelplasia of prostate
作者:
游猛 1吴杰英 2陈岳 1郑彬 1詹河涓 1狄金明 2
528031 广东,佛山禅城区中心医院泌尿外科1;510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科2
Author(s):
You Meng1 Wu Jieying2 Chen Yue1 Zheng Bin1 Zhan Hejuan1 Di Jinming2.
Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Foshan Chancheng District, Foshan 528000(,)China; 2Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510630, China
关键词:
大体积前列腺增生切除术安全性疗效比较
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2015.03.011
摘要:
目的比较耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术( TVP)与经尿道前列腺电切术( TURP)治疗体积 >80 ml前列腺增生的安全性及疗效。方法 156例经尿动力学确诊的膀胱出口梗阻和前列腺体积 >80 ml的患者,随机分至 TVP组和 TURP组。记录每例患者的围手术期指标及术后 1年的随访指标,予以对比分析。所有患者的术后并发症均予记录。结果 156例患者入选并参加该研究,其中 153例患者完成 12个月的随访。TVP组在留置尿管时间、膀胱冲洗时间较 TURP组长,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05); TVP组在手术时间上比 TURP组短,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05); TVP组在腺体切除重量上明显高于 TURP组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.001),两组患者术中出血量无统计学差异( P>0.05)。术后随访指标中,TVP组在国际前列腺症状评分( IPSS)、生活质量评分( QOL)、最大尿流率( Qmax)、膀胱残余尿量( PVR)上均优于经尿道前列腺切除术组。结论对于大体积(>80 ml)前列腺增生,耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术较经尿道前列腺切除术更有效及安全。

参考文献/References:

[1] Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, et al. Management of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In: European Association of Urology Guidelines[M]. 2012 ed. Arnhen: Drukkerij Gebler, 2012, 1-73.
[2]王建业 .良性前列腺增生诊断治疗指南,见:那彦群等 .中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南 [M] .北京 :人民卫生出版社, 2014: 259-260.
[3] Mayer EK, Kroeze SG, Chopra S, et al. Examining the 'Gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(11): 1595-1601.
[4] Yoo TK, Cho HJ. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: from bench to clinic[J]. Korean J Urol, 2012, 53(3): 139-148.
[5] Ou R, You M, Tang P, et al. A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 ml[J]. Urology, 2010, 76(4): 958-961.
[6] Protogerou V, Argyropoulos V, Patrozos K, et al. An alternative minimally invasive technique for large prostates (>80 mL): transvesical prostatectomy through a 3-cm incision [J]. Urology, 2010, 75(1): 184-186.
[7] Malaeb BS, Yu XH, Mcbean AM, et al. National trends in surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the United States (2000-2008)[J]. Urology, 2012, 79(5): 1111-1116.
[8] Geavlete B, Stanescu F, Iacoboaie CA. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases -a medium term, prospective, randomized comparison[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(5): 793-803.
[9] Liao N, Yu J. A study comparing plasmakinetic enucleation with bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(7): 884-888.
[10] Zhu L, Chen S, Yang S, et al. Electrosurgical enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for prostates larger than 70 ml: a prospective, randomized trial with 5-year followup [J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(4): 1427-1431.
[11] Kranzbühler B, Wettstein MS, Fankhauser CD, et al. Pure bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate: the Zürich experience [J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(10): 1261-1266.
[12] Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, et al. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients [J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(1): 246-249.
[13] Patrick C. Walsh MD. Campbell’s Urology [M]. Eighth Edition 2002ed: 1405-1423.
[14] Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, et al. Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients[J]. Urology, 2004, 64(2): 306-310.
[15]王荣 ,陈伟军 ,史文华 ,等.经尿道等离子双极和经膀胱前列腺摘除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的临床疗效比较[J].中国男科学杂志, 2014, 28(6): 33-37.(收稿日期: 2014-12-17

相似文献/References:

[1]邓立文,涂响安,邓春华.经尿道前列腺电切术后谵妄诊治的临床分析[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2008,(02):118.
 DENG Li-wen,TU Xian-gan,DENG Chun-hua.Clinical analysis of postoperative delirium in transurethral resection of the prostate[J].,2008,(03):118.
[2]王亮,李黎明,崔喆,等.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与普通电切术中失血量比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009,(01):11.
 WANG Liang,LI Li-ming,CUI Zhe,et al.Blood loss comparison of transurethral plasmakinetic resection versus conventional transurethral resection of the prostate[J].,2009,(03):11.
[3]杨德林,柯昌兴,王剑松,等.等离子电切术中不同方法治疗前列腺增生症(附1900例报告)[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009,(01):37.
 YANG De-lin,KE Chang-xing,WANG Jian-song,et al.Various methods of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for the treatment of BPH ( Report of 1900 cases)[J].,2009,(03):37.
[4]何志新,温天奋,彭晓东,等.经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗前列腺增生症[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009,(04):309.
[5]李方,徐友明,刘进,等.膀胱颈切开防止小体积前列腺汽化电切术后膀胱颈挛缩的回顾研究[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009,(06):508.
 LI Fang,XU You-ming,LIU Jin,et al.Compare the contracture of the bladder neck after TUVP with bladder neck incision or not in patients with small prostate: a retrospective study[J].,2009,(03):508.
[6]杨志国,赵海东,刘永江,等.急诊经尿道前列腺电切治疗良性前列腺增生并急性尿潴留[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,(01):46.
 YANG Zhi-guo,ZHAO Hai-dong,LIU Yong-jiang,et al.Transurethral resection of the prostate as emergency surgery for the treatment of BPH with acute urinary retention[J].,2010,(03):46.
[7]宋金亮,张斌.经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗合并糖尿病的良性前列腺增生症[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,(01):69.
[8]王玉亭,李金海.前列腺汽化电切术后出血原因及治疗对策分析[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,(03):204.
 WANG Yu-ting,LI Jin-hai.Analysis of the reasons and treatments of bleeding after tranurethral vaporization of the prostate[J].,2010,(03):204.
[9]彭明栋,陈永生,陈云峰,等.经尿道双极等离子体电切治疗高危前列腺增生症:附200例报告[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,(03):211.
 PENG Ming-dong,CHEN Yong-sheng,CHEN Yun-feng,et al.Bipolar plasma kinetic resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the patients with high risk: a report of 200 cases[J].,2010,(03):211.
[10]程书栋,王慕华,王建文,等.经尿道双极等离子前列腺腔内剜除术治疗前列腺增生220例临床疗效分析[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,(05):380.
 CHEN Shu-dong,WANG Mu-hua,WANG Jian-wen,et al.Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral enucleation of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Report of 220 cases[J].,2010,(03):380.
[11]关刚强,谢小平,何燊,等.经尿道前列腺电切术与经尿道前列腺剜除加腹部小切口术治疗大体积前列腺增生的疗效比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2012,(02):28.
 GUAN Gang-qiang,XIE Xiao-ping,HE Shen,et al.Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral enucleation of the prostate with abdominal incision for the large volume of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH): A comparative study[J].,2012,(03):28.
[12]唐青 庞俊 吴奇.经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗大体积前列腺增生[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2015,(04):274.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2015.04.010 ]
 Tang Qing,Pang Jun,Wu Qi..Transurethral enucleation of the prostate for large volume prostatic hyperplasia[J].,2015,(03):274.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2015.04.010 ]
[13]李贺洋 孟凡学 阎文新 冯刚.经尿道前列腺电切术与开放手术治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2014,(06):406.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2014.06.004 ]
 Li Heyang*,Meng Fanxue,Yan Wenxin,et al.A comparative study of transurethral resection of prostate and open prostatectomy for treatment of large hyperplsia of prostate[J].,2014,(03):406.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2014.06.004 ]
[14]游猛,郑彬,陈岳,等.基层医院耻骨上经膀胱和经尿道切除大体积前列腺的比较[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(02):94.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.02.007 ]
 You Meng,Zheng Bin,Chen Yue,et al.The comparison of efficacy of open and transurethral prostatectomy for treating big volume prostate in primary hospital[J].,2018,12(03):94.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.02.007 ]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:2014 省自然基金项目(2014A030313180)
通讯作者:狄金明,Email:746379204@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01