解剖性经后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的临床疗效观察

516600 广东,汕尾市第二人民医院(汕尾逸挥基金医院)外一科

肾上腺切除术;腹腔镜;解剖性

Comparison of clinical efficacy between anatomical and conventional retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy
Lai Zaichi, Fan Hangong, Li Sihua, Lin Yueyue.

Department of Urology, Shanwei Second People's Hospital(Shanwei Yihui Foudation Hospital), Guangdong 516600, China

Adrenalectomy; Laparoscopy; Anatomical

DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.03.005

备注

目的 对比分析解剖性与常规经后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的疗效和安全性。方法 选择2010年 1月至 2016年 12月在我院泌尿外科收治的肾上腺疾病患者 30例,其中行经后腹腔镜解剖性肾上腺切除术 14例(观察组),行经后腹腔镜常规肾上腺切除术 16例(对照组)。对比两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、拔引流管时间、住院时间以及患者术中术后并发症的情况。结果 与常规经后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术相比,解剖性经后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术组的手术时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05),术中出血量也比对照组的少(P<0.05)。此外,观察组的拔除引流管时间、住院时间也比对照组的短(P<0.05)。观察组的术中腹膜损伤率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 解剖性后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术强调沿着正确的解剖平面去寻找和分离肾上腺,具有快速、准确定位,术野清晰,出血少的优点,疗效确切,并发症少,值得在临床上推广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between anatomical and conventional retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Methods From January 2010 to December 2016, 30 patients with adrenal diseases in our hospital were enrolled into two groups, including 14 cases of anatomical retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (observation group), and 16 cases conventional retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (control group). The intraoperative blood loss, operative time, the time of drainage tube retention, hospital stay, and the complications were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the operation time, the time of drainage tube retention and hospital stay were shorter in observation group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative peritoneal injury rate in observation group were less than control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Anatomical retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy, which was exposed and separated the adrenal gland through the correct natural anatomical space, had advantages of higher efficiency, less bleeding, clear operation field, fewer complications, and is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
·